-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage: Use normal edition:
headers in coverage tests
#120566
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some of these tests were originally written as part of a custom `run-make` test, so at that time they weren't able to use the normal compiletest header directive parser. Now that they're properly integrated, there's no need for them to use `compile-flags` to specify the edition, since they can use `edition` instead.
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
labels
Feb 2, 2024
r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 2, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119543 (add avx512fp16 to x86 target features) - rust-lang#120004 (Release notes for 1.76) - rust-lang#120562 (Revert unsound libcore changes) - rust-lang#120566 (coverage: Use normal `edition:` headers in coverage tests) - rust-lang#120570 (Suggest changing type to const parameters if we encounter a type in the trait bound position) - rust-lang#120571 (Miscellaneous diagnostics cleanups) - rust-lang#120573 (Remove `BorrowckErrors::tainted_by_errors`) - rust-lang#120592 (Remove unnecessary `.to_string()`/`.as_str()`s) - rust-lang#120610 (hir: Remove the generic type parameter from `MaybeOwned`) - rust-lang#120616 (Fix ICE on field access on a tainted type after const-eval failure) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120569 (coverage: Improve handling of function/closure spans) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119543 (add avx512fp16 to x86 target features) - rust-lang#120004 (Release notes for 1.76) - rust-lang#120562 (Revert unsound libcore changes) - rust-lang#120566 (coverage: Use normal `edition:` headers in coverage tests) - rust-lang#120570 (Suggest changing type to const parameters if we encounter a type in the trait bound position) - rust-lang#120571 (Miscellaneous diagnostics cleanups) - rust-lang#120573 (Remove `BorrowckErrors::tainted_by_errors`) - rust-lang#120592 (Remove unnecessary `.to_string()`/`.as_str()`s) - rust-lang#120610 (hir: Remove the generic type parameter from `MaybeOwned`) - rust-lang#120616 (Fix ICE on field access on a tainted type after const-eval failure) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120569 (coverage: Improve handling of function/closure spans) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120566 - Zalathar:edition, r=compiler-errors coverage: Use normal `edition:` headers in coverage tests Some of these tests were originally written as part of a custom `run-make` test, so at that time they weren't able to use the normal compiletest header directive parser. Now that they're properly integrated, there's no need for them to use `compile-flags` to specify the edition, since they can use `edition` instead. In most cases the `.cov-map` snapshot isn't affected at all, but in a few cases we add or remove a line, which slightly disturbs the first line number in each instrumented function.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of these tests were originally written as part of a custom
run-make
test, so at that time they weren't able to use the normal compiletest header directive parser.Now that they're properly integrated, there's no need for them to use
compile-flags
to specify the edition, since they can useedition
instead.In most cases the
.cov-map
snapshot isn't affected at all, but in a few cases we add or remove a line, which slightly disturbs the first line number in each instrumented function.